1. Ng AT, Tam PC. Current status of robot-assisted surgery. Hong Kong Med J 2014;20:241–50.
2. Ramirez PT, Frumovitz M, Pareja R, Lopez A, Vieira M, Ribeiro R, et al. Minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 2018;379:1895–904.
4. Tse KY, Ngan HYS, Lim PC. Robot-assisted gynaecological cancer surgery-complications and prevention. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2017;45:94–106.
5. Park DA, Yun JE, Kim SW, Lee SH. Surgical and clinical safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy compared to conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 2017;43:994–1002.
6. Hwang JH. Urologic complication in laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: meta-analysis of 20 studies. Eur J Cancer 2012;48:3177–85.
7. Lowe MP, Johnson PR, Kamelle SA, Kumar S, Chamberlain DH, Tillmanns TD. A multiinstitutional experience with robotic-assisted hysterectomy with staging for endometrial cancer. Obstet Gynecol 2009;114(2 Pt 1):236–43.
8. Backes FJ, Brudie LA, Farrell MR, Ahmad S, Finkler NJ, Bigsby GE, et al. Short- and long-term morbidity and outcomes after robotic surgery for comprehensive endometrial cancer staging. Gynecol Oncol 2012;125:546–51.
9. Chan JK, Morrow J, Manetta A. Prevention of ureteral injuries in gynecologic surgery. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;188:1273–7.
10. Picerno T, Sloan NL, Escobar P, Ramirez PT. Bowel injury in robotic gynecologic surgery: risk factors and management options. A systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017;216:10–26.
14. Kim A, Geynisman-Tan J, Lewicky-Gaupp C. Pneumothorax after laparoscopic robotic-assisted supracervical hysterectomy and sacrocolpopexy. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg 2017;23:e22–4.
18. Murdock CM, Wolff AJ, Van Geem T. Risk factors for hypercarbia, subcutaneous emphysema, pneumothorax, and pneumomediastinum during laparoscopy. Obstet Gynecol 2000;95:704–9.
20. Lebowitz P, Yedlin A, Hakimi AA, Bryan-Brown C, Richards M, Ghavamian R. Respiratory gas exchange during robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. J Clin Anesth 2015;27:470–5.
23. Cusimano MC, Simpson AN, Dossa F, Liani V, Kaur Y, Acuna SA, et al. Laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomy in endometrial cancer patients with obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of conversions and complications. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2019;221:410. –28. e19.
26. Matanes E, Weissman A, Rivlin A, Lauterbach R, Amit A, Wiener Z, et al. Effects of pneumoperitoneum and the steep trendelenburg position on heart rate variability and cerebral oxygenation during robotic sacrocolpopexy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2018;25:70–5.
27. Lowenstein L, Mustafa M, Burke YZ, Mustafa S, Segal D, Weissman A. Steep Trendelenburg position during robotic sacrocolpopexy and heart rate variability. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2014;178:66–9.
28. Awad H, Walker CM, Shaikh M, Dimitrova GT, Abaza R, O'Hara J. Anesthetic considerations for robotic prostatectomy: a review of the literature. J Clin Anesth 2012;24:494–504.
29. Weber ED, Colyer MH, Lesser RL, Subramanian PS. Posterior ischemic optic neuropathy after minimally invasive prostatectomy. J Neuroophthalmol 2007;27:285–7.
31. Wen T, Deibert CM, Siringo FS, Spencer BA. Positioning-related complications of minimally invasive radical prostatectomies. J Endourol 2014;28:660–7.
32. Awad H, Bai M, Ramadan ME, Shabsigh A, Backes F, Craven MA, et al. The effect of increased intraocular pressure during steep trendelenburg positioning in robotic prostatectomy and hysterectomy on structural and functional ocular parameters. Anesth Analg 2020;130:975–82.
34. Manny TB, Gorbachinsky I, Hemal AK. Lower extremity neuropathy after robot assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and radical cystectomy. Can J Urol 2010;17:5390–3.
37. Boesgaard-Kjer DH, Boesgaard-Kjer D, Kjer JJ. Well-leg compartment syndrome after gynecological laparoscopic surgery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2013;92:598–600.
38. Bauer EC, Koch N, Janni W, Bender HG, Fleisch MC. Compartment syndrome after gynecologic operations: evidence from case reports and reviews. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2014;173:7–12.
39. Corrado G, Chiantera V, Fanfani F, Cutillo G, Lucidi A, Mancini E, et al. Robotic hysterectomy in severely obese patients with endometrial cancer: a multicenter study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2016;23:94–100.
41. Chan JK, Gardner AB, Taylor K, Thompson CA, Blansit K, Yu X, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic versus open surgery in morbidly obese endometrial cancer patients - a comparative analysis of total charges and complication rates. Gynecol Oncol 2015;139:300–5.
42. Yoshida K, Kondo E, Nimura R, Maki S, Kaneda M, Nii M, et al. Laparoscopic versus robotic hysterectomy in obese patients with early-stage endometrial cancer: a single-centre analysis. Anticancer Res 2021;41:4163–7.
43. Corrado G, Vizza E, Cela V, Mereu L, Bogliolo S, Legge F, et al. Laparoscopic versus robotic hysterectomy in obese and extremely obese patients with endometrial cancer: a multi-institutional analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 2018;44:1935–41.
45. Lindfors A, Heshar H, Adok C, Sundfeldt K, Dahm-Kähler P. Longterm survival in obese patients after robotic or open surgery for endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2020;158:673–80.
46. Jørgensen SL, Mogensen O, Wu CS, Korsholm M, Lund K, Jensen PT. Survival after a nationwide introduction of robotic surgery in women with early-stage endometrial cancer: a population-based prospective cohort study. Eur J Cancer 2019;109:1–11.
48. Guy MS, Sheeder J, Behbakht K, Wright JD, Guntupalli SR. Comparative outcomes in older and younger women undergoing laparotomy or robotic surgical staging for endometrial cancer. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016;214:350.e1–10.
49. Zakhari A, Czuzoj-Shulman N, Spence AR, Gotlieb WH, Abenhaim HA. Hysterectomy for uterine cancer in the elderly: a comparison between laparoscopic and robot-assisted techniques. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2016;26:1222–7.
51. Butt ZM, Fazili A, Tan W, Wilding GE, Filadora V, Kim HL, et al. Does the presence of significant risk factors affect perioperative outcomes after robot-assisted radical cystectomy? BJU Int 2009;104:986–90.
52. Kilic OF, Börgers A, Köhne W, Musch M, Kröpfl D, Groeben H. Effects of steep Trendelenburg position for robotic-assisted prostatectomies on intra- and extrathoracic airways in patients with or without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Br J Anaesth 2015;114:70–6.
53. Bauman TM, Potretzke AM, Vetter JM, Bhayani SB, Figenshau RS. Cerebrovascular disease and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease increase risk of complications with robotic partial nephrectomy. J Endourol 2016;30:293–9.
54. Espada M, Munoz R, Noble BN, Magrina JF. Insulation failure in robotic and laparoscopic instrumentation: a prospective evaluation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2011;205:121. e1-5.
55. Manoucheri E, Fuchs-Weizman N, Cohen SL, Wang KC, Einarsson J. MAUDE: analysis of robotic-assisted gynecologic surgery. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2014;21:592–5.
56. Catanzarite T, Saha S, Pilecki MA, Kim JY, Milad MP. Longer operative time during benign laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomy is associated with increased 30-day perioperative complications. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2015;22:1049–58.
58. Fanning J, Fenton B, Jean GM, Chae C. Cost analysis of prophylactic intraoperative cystoscopic ureteral stents in gynecologic surgery. J Am Osteopath Assoc 2011;111:667–9.
59. Schimpf MO, Gottenger EE, Wagner JR. Universal ureteral stent placement at hysterectomy to identify ureteral injury: a decision analysis. BJOG 2008;115:1151–8.
63. Gainsburg DM. Anesthetic concerns for robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Minerva Anestesiol 2012;78:596–604.
65. Fornalik H, Zore T, Fornalik N, Foster T, Katschke A, Wright G. Can teamwork and high-volume experience overcome challenges of lymphadenectomy in morbidly obese patients (body mass index of 40 kg/m
2 or greater) with endometrial cancer?: A cohort study of robotics and laparotomy and review of literature. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2018;28:959–66.
67. Desroches B, Porter J, Bhayani S, Figenshau R, Liu PY, Stifelman M. Comparison of the safety and efficacy of valveless and standard insufflation during robotic partial nephrectomy: a prospective, randomized, multi-institutional trial. Urology 2021;153:185–91.
68. Hagemann AR, McCourt CK, Varaday SS, Moore KN. Defining and mitigating the challenges of an older and obese population in minimally invasive gynecologic cancer surgery. Gynecol Oncol 2018;148:601–8.
69. Smith MJ, Lee J, Brodsky AL, Figueroa MA, Stamm MH, Giard A, et al. Optimizing robotic hysterectomy for the patient who is morbidly obese with a surgical safety pathway. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2021;28:2052. –9. e3.
70. Ngu SF, Cheung VY, Pun TC. Left upper quadrant approach in gynecologic laparoscopic surgery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2011;90:1406–9.
72. Ng JS, Leitao MM, Lim PC, Kim TJ, Kim SW. Asian Society for Gynecologic Robotic Surgery consensus guidelines on robotic surgery in gynecological cancer. Gyne Robot Surg 2020;1:2–13.