Gyne Robot Surg Search

CLOSE


Gyne Robot Surg > Volume 6(2); 2025 > Article
Soman and Chandrasekaran: Robotic excision of an accessory cavitated uterine mass: a step-by-step surgical approach
Accessory cavitated uterine mass (ACUM) is a rare Müllerian anomaly characterized by a non-communicating mass lined with functional endometrium, commonly located near the round ligament. It frequently presents in adolescents or young women with severe dysmenorrhea and is often misdiagnosed as adenomyosis, rudimentary horn, or myometrial cyst.
Etiology is believed to be congenital, likely involving a müllerian duct abnormality. Diagnostic criteria proposed by Acién et al [1]., include 1) an isolated accessory cavitated mass, 2) normal uterus (endometrial cavity), tubes, and ovaries, 3) surgical excision with pathological confirmation, 4) accessory cavity lined by endometrial epithelium with glands and stroma, 5) chocolate-brown fluid content, and 6) absence of adenomyosis in the rest of the uterus.
Takeuchi et al [2]. described ACUM as a solitary myometrial cyst ≥1 cm surrounded by hypertrophic endometrium, independent of the uterine lumen, occurring in women ≤30 years with severe dysmenorrhea.
Naftalin et al [3]. suggested ultrasound features such as a myometrial mantle with a fluid-filled cavity showing echogenic or hyperechoic contents.
Complete surgical excision is curative and essential for symptom resolution. Although laparoscopic excision has been described, robotic-assisted excision offers enhanced dexterity and precision, especially beneficial for preserving myometrial integrity.
A 22-year-old unmarried, nulliparous woman presented with severe dysmenorrhea unresponsive to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and hormonal therapy for 2 years. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed a 1.4×1.3 cm cavitated mass in the right posterior cornual region medial to the uterotubal junction-consistent with ACUM.
The patient was placed in the lithotomy position under general anesthesia in steep Trendelenburg. A four-port robotic approach using the da Vinci Xi System (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) was utilized. A 1.5×1.5 cm bulging mass was visualized near the right round ligament. The patient(s) included in this video gave consent for publication of the video and posting of the video online, including social media, the journal website, scientific literature websites (such as PubMed, ScienceDirect, Scopus, etc.), and other applicable sites.
Bilateral tubes and ovaries were normal. No signs of pelvic endometriosis. Vasopressin was injected into the myometrium to reduce bleeding. A longitudinal incision was made over the mass; chocolate-colored fluid was drained. The ACUM was sharply dissected and enucleated with care to preserve surrounding myometrium.
The specimen was placed in an endobag and retrieved through the assistant port. Uterine defect was closed in two layers using 0-V-Loc barbed suture for watertight closure. Hemostasis was confirmed; pelvis irrigated and suctioned.
Results were operative duration of 60 minutes, estimated blood loss <15 mL, no complications, and patient discharged on postoperative day 1. Histopathology confirmed a cavitated lesion lined with benign endometrial glands and stroma, surrounded by myometrial mantle-findings consistent with ACUM.
This case highlights the significance of accurate diagnosis and surgical precision in managing ACUM. Robotic-assisted excision, as supported by prior literature [4], enables precise dissection and optimal uterine reconstruction. Intraoperative identification and complete excision are essential to avoid recurrence or misdiagnosis.
The primary goal remains symptom resolution and preservation of fertility. Long-term outcomes post-complete excision are favorable, with minimal risk of recurrence or obstetric complications.
Robotic-assisted excision of ACUM is an effective, minimally invasive, and fertility-sparing surgical technique. It provides excellent anatomical restoration and symptom relief with minimal complications, offering a preferred approach in young patients.

Video related to this article

The video related to this article can be found online at 10.36637/grs.2025.00073.

Video 1.

Notes

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

1. Acién P, Acién M, Fernández F, Mayol MJ, Aranda I. The cavitated accessory uterine mass: a Müllerian anomaly in women with an otherwise normal uterus. Obstet Gynecol 2010;116:1101–9.
pmid
2. Takeuchi H, Kitade M, Kikuchi I, Kumakiri J, Kuroda K, Jinushi M. Diagnosis, laparoscopic management, and histopathologic findings of juvenile cystic adenomyoma: a review of nine cases. Fertil Steril 2010;94:862–8.
crossref pmid
3. Naftalin J, Bean E, Saridogan E, Barton-Smith P, Arora R, Jurkovic D. Imaging in gynecological disease (21): clinical and ultrasound characteristics of accessory cavitated uterine malformations. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2021;57:821–8.
crossref pmid pdf
4. Fleischer K, Britton F, Bachi A, Mondelli B, Adamczyk M, Narayanan P, et al. Robotic-assisted excision of an accessory cavitated uterine malformation with indocyanine green assessment of the uterine cavity. Fertil Steril 2025;123:730–2.
crossref pmid
TOOLS
Share :
Facebook Twitter Linked In Google+ Line it
METRICS Graph View
  • 0 Crossref
  •    
  • 646 View
  • 12 Download
Related articles in Gyne Robot Surg


ABOUT
ARTICLE CATEGORY

Browse all articles >

BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
AUTHOR INFORMATION
Editorial Office
The Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, ASAN MEDICAL CENTER, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea (05505)
Tel: +82-2-540-4339    Fax: +82-2-540-5597    E-mail: grsjournal.office@gmail.com                

Copyright © 2025 by Society of Korean Robotic Gynecologic Surgery.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next